Baloney. He didn't say anything about Charlize's situation. He was speaking in generalities about his views on parenting, as a parent, in a hypothetical situation with a 3 year old. It wasn't intolerant or insensitive at all. If you watch the source interview you'll see he goes out of his way to say he's not going to judge or evaluate another parent's approach to parenting.
I agree he said he's not going to tell others how to parent. But since this was immediately followed by him telling Owens that parenting one particular way was dangerous, it falls a bit flat. And Charlize had just (falsely, as far as I can tell) been used as the example of parenting that one particular way.
What nuance? All we have to go on are the quotes attributed to her in an interview with the Daily Mail:
'Yes, I thought she was a boy, too,' Charlize agrees, briskly. 'Until she looked at me when she was three years old and said: 'I am not a boy!' 'So there you go! I have two beautiful daughters who, just like any parent, I want to protect and I want to see thrive.
Doesn't appear to offer much room for nuance: 3 year old says "I am not a boy" and that's it.
Seriously? She was talking four years after that incident about why her child wore dresses and long hair. All it sounds like is, "this is when I first found out." It doesn't even remotely sound like, "and at that moment her gender was fixed in stone, no further discussion was had, and I am continuing to force this perspective on a child who was only going through a brief phase four years ago." And she actually stated "they were born who they are and exactly where in the world both of them get to find themselves as they grow up, and who they want to be, is not for me to decide." To me, that sounds like the opposite of what Owens and Lopez were complaining about.
Sure. Offer up some evidence to confirm this question.
I brought it up for you to consider. I'm not making a claim as to the answer. It's just a question I ask myself all the time, whenever I find myself making a positive or negative judgement when I don't know the whole story.
I'm assuming you don't feel there's an extreme left that is problematic and only an extreme right for which we should have concern. I'm game: prove it.
I don't know if there's an extreme left that is problematic. I've certainly heard people make extreme left claims I disagree with. I just haven't run into any of those claims as part of the agenda of the Democratic Party, whereas I have run into extreme right claims (that I disagree with) that are part of the agenda of the Republican Party. And some of these extreme right agendas have been successfully implemented in a way that negatively impacts me. So it's easy for me to think of examples for "deranged right wing agendas", but not "deranged left wing agendas".
I realize that just because I haven't run into something, it could still happen. But there should be examples that don't depend on ignoring any possibility of nuance, if this is really a thing.