Vortex
Member
Getting the Skeptiko forum rebooted, is a good piece of news for sure: in the latter time, it became a bit stagnant and inactive. And I decided to make a small reboot of my own – to reactivate an old “Where is everyone from?” thread, to provide some occasional pleasant distraction from the more serious topics we tend to discuss here.
So, here is my reflection on the nature of the European part of Russia, where I reside, as well as some popular cultural activities connected with it. I encourage all other forum members to follow my steps and provide some descriptions of such natural-cultural circumstances they find themselves in!
1. THE TIMES OF COLD AND WARMTH
Happy is a person, who finds nature of his or her place of residence suitable, rather than a source of constant distress. But happier is someone who can enjoy this natural conditions fully.
However, the natural conditions a human can enjoy are, oftentimes, also the ones a human has to endure, from time to time. The moderately continental climate of the European Russia is exactly the case.

The continentality is the most crucial feature of the Russian climate, whether of its European or of its Asian part. Such climatic type is common for the large landmasses of the Northern Hemisphere: first and foremost Eurasia, but also, to a lesser degree, North America. In the Southern Hemisphere, the continentality of climate is a rarity, only observed in few specific places, due to a deficit of land and abundance of oceans.
What is continentality? Roughly speaking, it is the range of temperatures common to a certain climate zone, be it annual (yearly) or diurnal (daily). The higher the degree of continentality is, the more notable is the difference of temperatures between seasons and between times of day – and the more extreme are the highs and lows of temperatures, observed (and felt) during summer and winter, as well as during day and night. Beyond the wider range of temperatures, and the distribution of temperatures in the range closer to the extremes, continentality also affects the speed of the change of temperatures: the higher the continentality is, the faster it gets warmer – or colder. Such quickness of the temperature change affects the lengths of the seasons: in a continental climate zone, mid-seasons – spring and autumn – are relatively short, while main seasons – summer and winter – are much longer: so, most of the year it is either very hot summer or a very cold winter, with only a short transitory periods of moderate temperatures between them.
All of above works well for Russia. In its European part, continentality is relatively moderate – but still significantly higher than in the rest of Europe or in most of the North America. This means, that Russian winters are notably colder than in the rest of Europe and most of America. Due to the large, and most densely populated, part of Russia being also further to the North in comparison with the most populated areas of Europe and North America, winters are also quite lengthy. But this is compensated by hot and relatively long – due to an aforementioned quickness of season change and shortness of spring and autumn.
It is practically useful to separate the yearly cycle in Russia not in four classic seasons, but just in two periods that radically differ in their climatic features, and thus in nature-related activities of the populace: the Cold Period and the Warm Period. The former is a time which starts with the first snowfalls and icing, and last till ice and snow cover fully melts; the temperatures are usually either near or below freezing point (0˚C), at least in nighttime. The latter, to the contrary, is characterised by the absence of snow, ice, and frosts, and by temperatures that are persistently and significantly above zero even in nighttime. Of course, further refinement of such classification, with more precise distinctions and separations within these seasons, is always possible – most notably, one may demarcate the full snow cover period within the Cold Period, as well as the wild swimming period (the period with water in the outdoor water bodies being warm enough to bathe and swim in it without a warm wetsuit for a person who is not exceptionally healthy and hardened) within the Warm Period. But, knowing the relative lengths of the Cold and Warm Periods, it is quite possible to calculate the shorter “inner periods” within them, since the ratios are more-or-less similar.
To be specific, full snow cover period – the period of a full-blown winter season – lasts roughly two-thirds of the Cold Period; so, if the Cold Period is, say, 6 months long, it means that “the winter proper” would last about 4 months. Other 2 months – one preceding it and one following it – will be, respectively, late autumn (the one with occasional snowfalls, icings and frosts, as well as temperature fluctuating close to the freezing point) and early spring (the period when the snow and ice covers on land and water are in the process of melting, yet have not yet largely gone; the temperature is also not highly above freezing, and “relapses” into frost happen from time to time).
As for the wild swimming period goes, demarcating its precisely is a somewhat tricky endeavour, since its defining feature – the swimmability of the open-air water bodies, such as rivers, lakes, ponds or channels –fundamentally depend on what exact minimum temperature one would consider enjoyable enough to swim. For me personally, the water temperature of +18˚C would be enough to experience enjoyment of the wild swimming fully and deeply; but for many other people, such cool temperature is completely unenjoyable – and for many others, even outright unendurable. Even more common lower swimmable temperature limit of +20˚C would still be experienced as far too low by a sizable amount of populace. Another problem is that water temperature is not the only one relevant for the swimmability – the air temperature, quite understandably, is also a significant factor, as well as precipitation (swimming in a rain is not what most people will prefer, and swimming in a thunderstorm is not the best idea for the one valuing one’s bodily existence). So, let’s say that, for an average person with average demands (but, well, how to define “average”? what is considered “average” is itself differing and changeable, and a subject to deliberation) the wild swimming season would last very crudely for a half of the Warm Season: so, if the Warm Season is, for example, 6 months, 3 of them would be potentially swimmable on the days with suitable wetter.
For how long do the Warm and Cold season last in the European Russia? It generally depends on what northern latitude one finds oneself. Here is a table, made by me, which separates the whole territory of the European Russia in seven distinct climatic zones, located on different northern latitudes, characterised not only by the length of the Warm Period, but also by other factors, such as their common humidity, the fertility of their soils and the dominant type of vegetation growing there:
(Yeah, it looks not so much as a "table"... But I failed to copy an original table from the MS Word file here. So I had to improvise.)
So, as you see, the Warm and Cold Periods are roughly of the same length in the middle of the European Russia, while, if moving either to the north or to the south, one of them gradually becomes longer than the other – predictably, the inhabitants of the north-from-the-center zones have to endure the Cold Period that is lengthier than the Warm one, while in the south-from-the-center zones the populace may enjoy the Warm Period that exceeds the Cold one in its duration.
And this distinction – the difference between endurance and enjoyment – is, despite its apparent subjectivity, is probably the most fundamental demarcation that separates the Cold and the Warm Periods: during the former, Russian climate is hard but endurable; during the latter, it is soft and enjoyable.
And these two experiential responses to the nature and climate – the endurance and the enjoyment – worth being reflected on in more detail.
2., ENDURING NATURE, ENJOYING NATURE
One only truly lives, as long as one wills to live; a willed life is a worthy life, a blessing. Without willingness to live, without worthiness with that the will imbues life, the life becomes worthless, a damnation. The same can be said about death: if willed, death can be worthy, and a blessing, rather than a worthless damnation. It is only one’s will that distinguish between blessing and damnation, choosing life or death in accordance with one’s willed worthiness.
And as long as one wills to live, rather than to die, one finds something in life that makes it worth living. And this is, invariably, some form of enjoyment, no matter whence it comes and whither it goes, be it enjoyment of creativity, of exploration, of communion, of activity or simply of amusement. Nature is such source of enjoyment, among others; and it is a rather significant source, since during our transient embodied existence within time and space, we have to experience natural conditions surrounding us day to day.
But to obtain enjoyment, one oftentimes needs to face some challenge to overcome – that, in turn, requires endurance. Rarely is enjoyment achievable without facing any difficulty.
Is it a desirable or an undesirable feature of life, that is has to be endured in order to be enjoyed. Probably yes, as long as enjoyment as much present as endurance. Humans’ interaction with nature provides us with examples: if one looks at various tribes of people, living in various conditions, one can see that tribes that show development of their culture are the ones whose natural conditions of life are both require endurance and provide enjoyment. If endurance prevails too much, if life is a constant struggle for the mere survival – like it is for the people living in the Arctic – the tribe has no possibility to develop its culture beyond the primitive level. But if, to the contrary, the tribe lives in a climatic paradise of a tropical island, its culture will also remain on a primitive level, since, if everything is fully enjoyable already, there is no necessity to struggle and thus no stimulus to develop.
One may say that culture is born from exactly this tension between endurance and enjoyment: it is itself a form of endurance, providing us with the means of overcoming challenges, and a source of enjoyment that the engagement in it brings.
More than that, the endurance and the enjoyment are interconnected on a deeper level, since the successful feats of endurance may themselves be a source of enjoyment, like the one of mountaineering or of a laborious research. And some intense forms of enjoyment, like the ones involving alcohol or any other psychoactive substances, requires certain endurance to participate in them.
The nature of the European Russia is can be an especially good case to demonstrate how endurance and enjoyment works in the relations between the human populace and the natural environment it inhabits, since the Cold and the Warm Periods are the times of, respectively, predominant endurance and prevalent enjoyment. It may be shown how the Russian people find enjoyment even in the Cold Period of the endurance, and how they seek certain forms of endurance in the Warm Period of enjoyment (in order to enjoy it even more, of course!). So, let’s do this.
In my description, I will concentrate on the conditions of my home city of Nizhny Novgorod, situated on the 56th northern latitude in the Central Climatic Zone, with both Cold and Warm Periods equally lasting for about 6 months, somewhat humid climate, relatively poor soil fertility and mixed, partially coniferous and partly broad-leaved, forests as the main type of vegetation.

(continued below)
So, here is my reflection on the nature of the European part of Russia, where I reside, as well as some popular cultural activities connected with it. I encourage all other forum members to follow my steps and provide some descriptions of such natural-cultural circumstances they find themselves in!
***OF ENJOYMENT AND ENDURANCE: EXPERIENCING NATURE OF THE EUROPEAN RUSSIA***
1. THE TIMES OF COLD AND WARMTH
Happy is a person, who finds nature of his or her place of residence suitable, rather than a source of constant distress. But happier is someone who can enjoy this natural conditions fully.
However, the natural conditions a human can enjoy are, oftentimes, also the ones a human has to endure, from time to time. The moderately continental climate of the European Russia is exactly the case.

The continentality is the most crucial feature of the Russian climate, whether of its European or of its Asian part. Such climatic type is common for the large landmasses of the Northern Hemisphere: first and foremost Eurasia, but also, to a lesser degree, North America. In the Southern Hemisphere, the continentality of climate is a rarity, only observed in few specific places, due to a deficit of land and abundance of oceans.
What is continentality? Roughly speaking, it is the range of temperatures common to a certain climate zone, be it annual (yearly) or diurnal (daily). The higher the degree of continentality is, the more notable is the difference of temperatures between seasons and between times of day – and the more extreme are the highs and lows of temperatures, observed (and felt) during summer and winter, as well as during day and night. Beyond the wider range of temperatures, and the distribution of temperatures in the range closer to the extremes, continentality also affects the speed of the change of temperatures: the higher the continentality is, the faster it gets warmer – or colder. Such quickness of the temperature change affects the lengths of the seasons: in a continental climate zone, mid-seasons – spring and autumn – are relatively short, while main seasons – summer and winter – are much longer: so, most of the year it is either very hot summer or a very cold winter, with only a short transitory periods of moderate temperatures between them.
All of above works well for Russia. In its European part, continentality is relatively moderate – but still significantly higher than in the rest of Europe or in most of the North America. This means, that Russian winters are notably colder than in the rest of Europe and most of America. Due to the large, and most densely populated, part of Russia being also further to the North in comparison with the most populated areas of Europe and North America, winters are also quite lengthy. But this is compensated by hot and relatively long – due to an aforementioned quickness of season change and shortness of spring and autumn.
It is practically useful to separate the yearly cycle in Russia not in four classic seasons, but just in two periods that radically differ in their climatic features, and thus in nature-related activities of the populace: the Cold Period and the Warm Period. The former is a time which starts with the first snowfalls and icing, and last till ice and snow cover fully melts; the temperatures are usually either near or below freezing point (0˚C), at least in nighttime. The latter, to the contrary, is characterised by the absence of snow, ice, and frosts, and by temperatures that are persistently and significantly above zero even in nighttime. Of course, further refinement of such classification, with more precise distinctions and separations within these seasons, is always possible – most notably, one may demarcate the full snow cover period within the Cold Period, as well as the wild swimming period (the period with water in the outdoor water bodies being warm enough to bathe and swim in it without a warm wetsuit for a person who is not exceptionally healthy and hardened) within the Warm Period. But, knowing the relative lengths of the Cold and Warm Periods, it is quite possible to calculate the shorter “inner periods” within them, since the ratios are more-or-less similar.
To be specific, full snow cover period – the period of a full-blown winter season – lasts roughly two-thirds of the Cold Period; so, if the Cold Period is, say, 6 months long, it means that “the winter proper” would last about 4 months. Other 2 months – one preceding it and one following it – will be, respectively, late autumn (the one with occasional snowfalls, icings and frosts, as well as temperature fluctuating close to the freezing point) and early spring (the period when the snow and ice covers on land and water are in the process of melting, yet have not yet largely gone; the temperature is also not highly above freezing, and “relapses” into frost happen from time to time).
As for the wild swimming period goes, demarcating its precisely is a somewhat tricky endeavour, since its defining feature – the swimmability of the open-air water bodies, such as rivers, lakes, ponds or channels –fundamentally depend on what exact minimum temperature one would consider enjoyable enough to swim. For me personally, the water temperature of +18˚C would be enough to experience enjoyment of the wild swimming fully and deeply; but for many other people, such cool temperature is completely unenjoyable – and for many others, even outright unendurable. Even more common lower swimmable temperature limit of +20˚C would still be experienced as far too low by a sizable amount of populace. Another problem is that water temperature is not the only one relevant for the swimmability – the air temperature, quite understandably, is also a significant factor, as well as precipitation (swimming in a rain is not what most people will prefer, and swimming in a thunderstorm is not the best idea for the one valuing one’s bodily existence). So, let’s say that, for an average person with average demands (but, well, how to define “average”? what is considered “average” is itself differing and changeable, and a subject to deliberation) the wild swimming season would last very crudely for a half of the Warm Season: so, if the Warm Season is, for example, 6 months, 3 of them would be potentially swimmable on the days with suitable wetter.
For how long do the Warm and Cold season last in the European Russia? It generally depends on what northern latitude one finds oneself. Here is a table, made by me, which separates the whole territory of the European Russia in seven distinct climatic zones, located on different northern latitudes, characterised not only by the length of the Warm Period, but also by other factors, such as their common humidity, the fertility of their soils and the dominant type of vegetation growing there:
Climatic Zones
Northern Latitudes
Warm Period
Humidity Level
Soil Fertility
Predominant Vegetation
Far North
65 and higher
3 months (Jun – Aug)
humid
permafrost to infertile
tundra and forest-tundra to coniferous forests
North
61 – 64
4 months (mid-May – mid-Sep)
humid
infertile
coniferous forests
Semi-North
57 – 60
5 months (May – Sep)
humid
infertile
coniferous and mixed forests
Center
54 – 56
6 months (mid-Apr – mid-Oct)
semi-humid
infertile to fertile
mixed forests
Semi-South
50 – 53
7 months (Apr –Oct)
semi-humid to semi-arid
fertile
mixed and broad-leaved forests to forest-steppes and steppes
South
46 – 49
8 months (mid-Mar – mid-Nov)
semi-arid to arid
fertile
forest-steppes and steppes to semi-deserts and deserts
Far South
45 and lower
9 months (Mar – Nov)
semi-arid to semi-humid
fertile
steppes and forest-steppes to broad-leaved forests
Northern Latitudes
Warm Period
Humidity Level
Soil Fertility
Predominant Vegetation
Far North
65 and higher
3 months (Jun – Aug)
humid
permafrost to infertile
tundra and forest-tundra to coniferous forests
North
61 – 64
4 months (mid-May – mid-Sep)
humid
infertile
coniferous forests
Semi-North
57 – 60
5 months (May – Sep)
humid
infertile
coniferous and mixed forests
Center
54 – 56
6 months (mid-Apr – mid-Oct)
semi-humid
infertile to fertile
mixed forests
Semi-South
50 – 53
7 months (Apr –Oct)
semi-humid to semi-arid
fertile
mixed and broad-leaved forests to forest-steppes and steppes
South
46 – 49
8 months (mid-Mar – mid-Nov)
semi-arid to arid
fertile
forest-steppes and steppes to semi-deserts and deserts
Far South
45 and lower
9 months (Mar – Nov)
semi-arid to semi-humid
fertile
steppes and forest-steppes to broad-leaved forests
(Yeah, it looks not so much as a "table"... But I failed to copy an original table from the MS Word file here. So I had to improvise.)
So, as you see, the Warm and Cold Periods are roughly of the same length in the middle of the European Russia, while, if moving either to the north or to the south, one of them gradually becomes longer than the other – predictably, the inhabitants of the north-from-the-center zones have to endure the Cold Period that is lengthier than the Warm one, while in the south-from-the-center zones the populace may enjoy the Warm Period that exceeds the Cold one in its duration.
And this distinction – the difference between endurance and enjoyment – is, despite its apparent subjectivity, is probably the most fundamental demarcation that separates the Cold and the Warm Periods: during the former, Russian climate is hard but endurable; during the latter, it is soft and enjoyable.
And these two experiential responses to the nature and climate – the endurance and the enjoyment – worth being reflected on in more detail.
2., ENDURING NATURE, ENJOYING NATURE
One only truly lives, as long as one wills to live; a willed life is a worthy life, a blessing. Without willingness to live, without worthiness with that the will imbues life, the life becomes worthless, a damnation. The same can be said about death: if willed, death can be worthy, and a blessing, rather than a worthless damnation. It is only one’s will that distinguish between blessing and damnation, choosing life or death in accordance with one’s willed worthiness.
And as long as one wills to live, rather than to die, one finds something in life that makes it worth living. And this is, invariably, some form of enjoyment, no matter whence it comes and whither it goes, be it enjoyment of creativity, of exploration, of communion, of activity or simply of amusement. Nature is such source of enjoyment, among others; and it is a rather significant source, since during our transient embodied existence within time and space, we have to experience natural conditions surrounding us day to day.
But to obtain enjoyment, one oftentimes needs to face some challenge to overcome – that, in turn, requires endurance. Rarely is enjoyment achievable without facing any difficulty.
Is it a desirable or an undesirable feature of life, that is has to be endured in order to be enjoyed. Probably yes, as long as enjoyment as much present as endurance. Humans’ interaction with nature provides us with examples: if one looks at various tribes of people, living in various conditions, one can see that tribes that show development of their culture are the ones whose natural conditions of life are both require endurance and provide enjoyment. If endurance prevails too much, if life is a constant struggle for the mere survival – like it is for the people living in the Arctic – the tribe has no possibility to develop its culture beyond the primitive level. But if, to the contrary, the tribe lives in a climatic paradise of a tropical island, its culture will also remain on a primitive level, since, if everything is fully enjoyable already, there is no necessity to struggle and thus no stimulus to develop.
One may say that culture is born from exactly this tension between endurance and enjoyment: it is itself a form of endurance, providing us with the means of overcoming challenges, and a source of enjoyment that the engagement in it brings.
More than that, the endurance and the enjoyment are interconnected on a deeper level, since the successful feats of endurance may themselves be a source of enjoyment, like the one of mountaineering or of a laborious research. And some intense forms of enjoyment, like the ones involving alcohol or any other psychoactive substances, requires certain endurance to participate in them.
The nature of the European Russia is can be an especially good case to demonstrate how endurance and enjoyment works in the relations between the human populace and the natural environment it inhabits, since the Cold and the Warm Periods are the times of, respectively, predominant endurance and prevalent enjoyment. It may be shown how the Russian people find enjoyment even in the Cold Period of the endurance, and how they seek certain forms of endurance in the Warm Period of enjoyment (in order to enjoy it even more, of course!). So, let’s do this.
In my description, I will concentrate on the conditions of my home city of Nizhny Novgorod, situated on the 56th northern latitude in the Central Climatic Zone, with both Cold and Warm Periods equally lasting for about 6 months, somewhat humid climate, relatively poor soil fertility and mixed, partially coniferous and partly broad-leaved, forests as the main type of vegetation.

(continued below)